If you wish to receive this message, please contact us. Below is a description of the content of the message.
This message begins with the Supreme Body calling on the assemblage of Counsellors to ensure the successful launch of the Five Year Plan (2001-2006). Given the great changes in the fortunes of the Faith in the preceding years the House of Justice states that “[t]he Cause of Baha’u'llah stands at the threshold of a new epoch”, noting “an increasing receptivity to His all-pervasive and resplendent Spirit.” The acceleration of the advancement of the process of entry by troops is the aim of the new Plan, to be achieved “through systematic activity on the part of the three participants in the Plan: the individual believer, institutions, and the community.”
The growth of the training institutes is identified as one of the significant achievements of the previous Four Year Plan. The institutes have not only enhanced “the powers of the individual, but also vitali[zed] communities and institutions.” Consequently the House of Justuce states that the “continued development of training institutes… must be a central feature of the new Plan.” In discussing the importance of child education the role of the training institute is outlined.
The Supreme Body explains that along with the development of training must come the systematizing of teaching efforts, achieved through a “combined process of action, learning and training”. The role of the Auxiliary Board members and assistants is addressed, specifically in the cultivation of individual teaching initiative, for “[w]hen training and encouragement are effective, a culture of growth is nourished in which the believers see their duty to teach as a natural consequence of having accepted Baha’u'llah.” In this culture “[m]utual support, commitment to learning, and appreciation of diversity of action are the prevailing norms.”
The House of Justice elaborates on the process by which national communities are to formulate plans for systematic growth. This will begin by dividing these communities
into “smaller geographic areas” or clusters. The House of Justice identifies some of the (non-Baha’i) criteria which will determine the boundaries of these areas. Descriptions of the various categories of Baha’i development are then outlined, ranging from clusters as yet unopened to the Faith to those areas able “to take on the challenges of systematic and accelerated expansion and consolidation.”
Some of the “propitious” conditions required for a cluster to begin an intensive programme of growth are set out and the nature of these programmes clarified. At the programme’s “core” “must lie a sound and steady process of expansion, matched by an equally strong process of human resource development.” The House of Justice reminds us of the purpose of these intensive programmes: “to ensure that the Revelation of Baha’u'llah reaches the masses of humanity and enables them to achieve
spiritual and material progress through the application of the Teachings.”
The concluding paragraph provides a compelling context for our actions: “The Major Plan of God is at work and the forces it generates impel humanity towards its destiny. In their own plans of action, the institutions of the Faith must seek to gain insight into the operation of these great forces, explore the potentialities of the people they serve, measure the resources and strengths of their communities, and take practical steps to enlist the unreserved participation of the believers.”